mirror of
https://github.com/mauriceboe/TREK.git
synced 2026-10-19 05:26:47 +00:00
Maurice
3caafe0548
Measured against 128 places out of a real trip to Japan, all saved through the old search: the index answered 51.6 percent inside its top five. For most of the rest it returned the shops AROUND the landmark rather than nothing, which is worse than nothing, because ten plausible wrong answers look like an answer. Overture Places is a dataset of businesses and is very good at those. It largely does not carry temples, bridges, riverside walks, viewpoints or observation decks, which is a fair share of what somebody planning a trip searches for. Two ways to detect "the index does not have this one" were measured and both failed. Its own score does not separate the cases: a 0.75 threshold catches 19 of 62 misses and throws away 6 of 66 hits. Name overlap does not either: 57 false positives, because "Hase Station" shares a word with "Hase-dera". So this does not classify. Explicit search asks both concurrently and merges, name matches first and the index ahead of OpenStreetMap within each group. Autocomplete is untouched, because Nominatim's policy names it as unacceptable use. Nominatim also gets the location bias it never had, without which "Hase-dera" returns the temple in Nara rather than the one in Kamakura the user is standing beside. Two booking-import cases still stubbed searchNominatim after geocoding moved to geocodeQuery, and stubbed it with the old array shape, which made "has coordinates" pass on an undefined lat.