Files
TREK/server
Maurice 11afd3648e Put the coverage back where the code went
Every split on this branch dropped the giving domain's ratchet without a line
being tested any worse: coverage follows the source file, so when
well-covered code leaves, the weaker branches that stay behind become the
whole denominator. days fell from 82 to 77.5 percent branches that way, feeds
to 76.7, trip-read-model to 62.5.

The rule in vitest.config.ts is that the only way past a number is to raise
it, so these are tests, not edits to the thresholds. days is back at 92.1,
calendar at 96.2, trip-read-model at 100.

feeds and trip-members and trip-read-model had no unit test at all - feeds'
whole threshold rested on one e2e, which is exactly the file whose contract
this branch rewrote. They have one now, and the read-model test pins the
thing in that file that would leak data if it regressed: getTripSummary and
bundle both thread the viewer id into packing.listItems so another member's
private items stay hidden, and nothing asserted that before.

The five thresholds this branch introduced move up to what they now measure,
with a few points of slack. The pre-existing entries are left alone on
purpose: they were generated from a Linux run, CI measures there, and a
handful of branches are platform-specific - raising them from a Windows
measurement is how you get a failure that reproduces nowhere local.
2026-08-10 13:38:26 +02:00
..
2026-07-19 19:00:40 +02:00
2026-05-06 21:38:40 +02:00
2026-06-16 22:22:45 +02:00
2026-06-16 22:22:45 +02:00
2026-06-16 22:22:45 +02:00
2026-06-16 22:22:45 +02:00