Attribution first, because this branch argues the point itself: the card names
the sources with the comment that naming them is a licence obligation rather
than decoration, and the copy beside it promises that every field says where it
came from. The POI path then stamped Overture rows as OpenStreetMap. Overture is
not OpenStreetMap — it carries OSM among other sources under other licences — so
that is a wrong attribution rather than a rounded one. The wire contract keeps
`source` an open string and nothing on the client switches on it, so saying
`trek-places` costs nothing. The MCP tool description no longer calls itself an
OpenStreetMap tool either, and says which source answered.
Adding one place cost two round trips to the index. The details lookup fetches
the place and its answer carries the description; toPlaceRecord dropped that
field, so the enrichment fetched the same place again a moment later to read it.
It is carried through now and read from what the caller already has, with the
second lookup left as the fallback for when there is nothing to read.
That description's source URL becomes an href on the client and was taken on
`typeof === 'string'` alone. It now goes through the same allow-list a place's
website goes through — the file already does this for menu_url, with the comment
explaining why — so anything but http(s) loses the link and keeps the text.
The instance token was hashed from raw APP_URL, which the shipped compose file
leaves commented out. Every default install therefore sent the same token, and a
token every caller shares is not a caller: one instance running a large import
would rate-limit all the others, who would fall back to Nominatim with nothing
to point at. getAppUrl() falls through to ALLOWED_ORIGINS and then to the port,
so unconfigured instances still differ.
Two client-side leaks. A pick made out of the offline cache was recorded into
the shadow corpus, where it moved the two figures the corpus exists to
measure — and offline is a setting, so the network is usually reachable and the
row landed. And the prefetch never re-checked the session after its request came
back: a logout in that window repoints the handle at the anonymous database, so
one person's trip area was written where the next person's offline search reads.
The cache path also ignored the abort signal, so an answer for a keystroke two
keystrokes old could overwrite a newer suggestion list. It rejects the way both
surfaces already know to swallow.
Left alone, and said in a comment rather than hidden: the index cannot localise.
The Overpass path picks name:<lang> and falls back to int_name; the service has
no language parameter at all, so a German reader exploring Tokyo gets the
Japanese primary names on this path.
The corpus behind "is our own index good enough to replace Nominatim".
When somebody searches and then picks a result, the client posts the query,
the rank and the pick. Nothing else: no user, no trip, no session, and
coordinates only to three decimals.
Deliberately decoupled from the search endpoint. Correlating a response
with a later pick would mean handing out a ticket on POST /api/maps/search
and threading it through all fifteen call sites; the client already holds
everything the row needs at the moment of the pick.
Evaluation happens offline afterwards: export the corpus, run it against a
candidate index, count how often the pick came back in the top five. That
is why collection can start before such an index exists, which is the whole
point, because the corpus needs weeks of real use and the index needs a
server, and those two waits should not be serial.
Off unless an admin switches it on, and it reads === 'true' rather than
!== 'false'. The three older places switches fail open because a migration
backfilled a row for installs already using them; nothing uses this one, so
an instance that upgrades and never visits the admin panel logs nothing.
Reading is admin only, retention is 180 days, and the switch state is on the
unauthenticated app-config endpoint on purpose: whether an instance records
what its users search for is something a visitor may know before logging in.