mirror of
https://github.com/mauriceboe/TREK.git
synced 2026-10-25 00:13:00 +00:00
ci(client): fail the count ratchets on an entry above the tree
lint:size, lint:layers, lint:rtl (both baselines), lint:skips and lint:warnings only failed a count that passed its entry. A count that fell below its entry was logged and nothing more, so a file that shrank could grow back to its old entry unseen, and the entry of a deleted file stayed behind for the next file at that path. lint:format and lint:offline already fail on such a stale entry, and the docs said these counts may only shrink. Each of them now fails on an entry that lowerCounts would lower or drop, naming its count or saying the file is gone, and tells to run --update, which still only lowers. staleCounts and reportStale in lib/ratchet.mjs hold the shared part. Every baseline matches the tree today, so none needed lowering. The client CLAUDE.md says so, and that CI lints through lint:warnings rather than lint:check.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -93,6 +93,17 @@ describe('lint:skips', () => {
|
||||
expect(JSON.parse(readFileSync(tree.path(BASELINE), 'utf8'))).toEqual({ 'src/a.test.ts': 2 });
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('SKIPS-010: fails an entry above the skips a file holds, or for a file that is gone, until --update', () => {
|
||||
const files = { 'src/a.test.ts': "it.skip('a', () => {})\n" };
|
||||
expect(run({ 'src/a.test.ts': 2, 'tests/gone.test.ts': 1 }, files)).toBe(1);
|
||||
const out = tree.error.join('\n');
|
||||
expect(out).toMatch(/src\/a\.test\.ts is held at 2 in scripts\/skip-baseline\.json, but there are 1 now/);
|
||||
expect(out).toMatch(/tests\/gone\.test\.ts is held at 1 .*but the file is gone/);
|
||||
expect(out).toMatch(/npm run lint:skips -- --update/);
|
||||
tree.remove();
|
||||
expect(run({ 'src/a.test.ts': 2, 'tests/gone.test.ts': 1 }, files, true)).toBe(0);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('SKIPS-009: counts every vitest skip, whatever its title is', () => {
|
||||
const source = [
|
||||
"const T = 'a'",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user